My beef with FPS.

I love a good war game. From Call of Duty to Killzone to Battlefield; I love running and gunning! BUT my love only goes so far.

This week I played the single player of Call of Duty : Black Ops. Needless to say it pissed me off. Many of you may be shocked to know that I do not believe that Modern Warfare 2 and Black Ops should be the standard with FPS’s. I bored quickly with them. But this is not a rant about that. It is something that every FPS has in it.

Why do you have to follow someone throughout the single player modes in many of these games? In many cases these characters or NPC’s get in the way, do not help draw fire, or help with the “enemy” situation. They yell at you, slow down the gameplay, and in general get you shot.

So, please, please game companies making the next and newest FPS, knock it off. I don’t want to follow Sgt. Blah. Give me the mission and let me make my own path. In many cases, the easier, stealthier path.

Also, stop with the dramatic knife in the back scenes. We get it, you can kill with the knife. Do not make it seem as though you have taught us how to use a lightsaber. Unless of course it is a lightsaber.

Alright, that is all…for now.

Medal of Honor : DICE Multiplayer Beta = not Battlefield : Bad Company 2

I was able to pre-order Medal of Honor through Gamestop the other day. With a pre-order I was given a key code to try the multiplayer beta. The Beta is going on from June 21st-July 18th. I am also a part of the EA Gun Club so I got to get in before June 21st. Sometimes it pays to be part of every side group with a game.

Anyway . . .

DICE is trying some different things with MOH’s multiplayer. Some of it is concerning. They did such a wonderful job with Battlefield : Bad Company 2. I almost want to shake them and tell them to stop changing the wheel!

The first thing that is different is the controls. Now, I know this is a BETA and that nothing is final, but why have different controls for something that the bulk of your players are still on another game (BFBC2) and use to that scheme? If it offered something different, I would say sure. But not in this case.

I did not see any actual team play. Mainly just people running around and shooting. Very COD if you ask me. I like the team work aspect that they did in BFBC2. I hate to keep bringing up Bad Company, but it is a great multiplayer system!

The graphics are sharp. The ragdoll animations are a little stiff. The weapons , though few offered, looked great. There is some learning curve to the use of them. The strength of a light machine gun feels almost the same as a AK. That does not make sense and needs to be fixed. Grenades need more power. I also, want to say this about all FPS – IF YOU GET HIT BY A .50, IT SHOULD BE A ONE HIT DEAL. I am so tired of shooting guys with tank guns/heavy machine guns and them running away.

Bottom line is that DICE really needs to use these next few months to implement ideas from their successful Battlefield Bad Company and make this the game that would make any Call of Duty fan weep. They have a lot of work in front of them.

Also, if you are running a PS3, it crashes and freezes a lot. DICE knows that and are working on it.